Masha, il faut « blasphémer » au moins une fois par jour - le concept a beau être nul et non avenu, on est encore bien trop près du trou du c*l de la pensée pour se dispenser de cette hygiène mentale
Mais en quoi dire que JC aurait pu être gay serait-il insultant ?
Fandango a écrit :
Redstein a écrit :
D'autant que contrairement à JC (pas Jules César), Mahomet était clairement hétéro
C'est quoi tes sources ?
Pour ce qu'on en sait 2000 plus tard, JC est une fiction - mais pas pour tout le monde :
Citation:
Jesus was a Hebrew rabbi. Unusually, he was unmarried. The idea that he had a romantic relationship with Mary Magdalene is the stuff of fiction, based on no biblical evidence.
The evidence, on the other hand, that he may have been what we today call gay is very strong. But even gay rights campaigners in the church have been reluctant to suggest it. A significant exception was Hugh Montefiore, bishop of Birmingham and a convert from a prominent Jewish family. He dared to suggest that possibility and was met with disdain, as though he were simply out to shock.
After much reflection and with certainly no wish to shock, I felt I was left with no option but to suggest, for the first time in half a century of my Anglican priesthood, that Jesus may well have been homosexual.
Had he been devoid of sexuality, he would not have been truly human. To believe that would be heretical.
'Human beings. You always manage to find the boring alternative, don't you?'
http://fermons-les-abattoirs.org
- Quand Redstein montre l'abattoir, l'imbécile regarde Redstein - (©Masha)
