- #171
- Publié par
FetR le 03 Août 2006, 10:16
Trouvé sur le forum Rickenbacker, post intitulé :"Why no more WB option for 360s?":
Arrow201:"i've never been a fan of the soft rounded edges, the pointy horns look so much cooler ...but you either have to go down a notch and get a 330 or a vintage 360 ...but it's available only in fireglo and has the square tailpiece ...sure glad i bought my 360/12WB Jetglo in '90 while it was still available. Everyone i speak to prefers the look of the 360WB ....why did Rick stop making the WB option available ?"
Eggman:"Good question! I'd like to have a 360 WB myself. They looks SO cool with those pointed, bound cut-aways."
Scruz:"I'd also like to see them make a return to production. My 360WB always turns a lot of heads."
Et la réponse de John Hall en personne:
JH:" ...why did Rick stop making the WB option available ? In a word, cost. Two sides of binding takes significantly greater time, effort, and care, adding up to a labor cost that most people wouldn't justify paying at today's labor rates. Does a 360 WB still sound appealing to you at perhaps $2700 to $2900?"
Je me dis que j'ai pas mal de chance...
Pour ta question Les Paul Jr, Je garde le capot tout simplement parceque je pose ma paume dessus lorsque je joue. Personnellement je trouve ça très pratique et par rapport au sustain, je ne trouve pas qu'il en bouffe tant que ça...
re
-
All the places we surfed and danced, and all the faces we missed, so let's get back together, and do it again!
Rickenbacker Rebel - Jaguar User - Telecaster Player
www.myspace.com/drifteaseline